Hazardous Waste

(All-male) Iowa Supreme Court: Bosses can fire employees they find “irresistible”

fuckyeahfeminists:

jessicavalenti:

Welcome to the patriarchy!

A dentist acted legally when he fired an assistant that he found attractive simply because he and his wife viewed the woman as a threat to their marriage, the all-male Iowa Supreme Court ruled Friday.

The court ruled 7-0 that bosses can fire employees they see as an “irresistible attraction,” even if the employees have not engaged in flirtatious behavior or otherwise done anything wrong.

image

UMMM THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE.

knowhomo:

Changes in Government You May Have Missed
ThinkProgress.org’s Change in Congress Infographic
  (For a larger image, click to the physical post and then on photo.
   Or just CLICK HERE.)

knowhomo:

Changes in Government You May Have Missed

ThinkProgress.org’s Change in Congress Infographic

  (For a larger image, click to the physical post and then on photo.

   Or just CLICK HERE.)

theatlantic:

nationaljournal:

The New Faces of the 113th Congress
The 2012 House and Senate elections brought over 80 new members to Washington. 
Use our interactive application to sort and filter the freshmen by age, experience, ethnicity, and more. 
Hover over each picture for name, state, and district information. To read a full narrative of each newcomer, written by the staff of The Almanac of American Politics, click the member’s picture.

This is very cool.

theatlantic:

nationaljournal:

The New Faces of the 113th Congress

The 2012 House and Senate elections brought over 80 new members to Washington.

Use our interactive application to sort and filter the freshmen by age, experience, ethnicity, and more.

Hover over each picture for name, state, and district information. To read a full narrative of each newcomer, written by the staff of The Almanac of American Politics, click the member’s picture.

This is very cool.

(via amyleona)

shooting4ownhand:

fatttttyfatdancepants:

adventuresofcomicbookgirl:

Some of this is taken from other posts. Ladies makin’ history collage.

Mary Gonzalez is the Representative-elect for Texas and will be the first openly pansexual official in the United States. She acknowledged the existence of non-binary identities when she came out.

Mazie Hirono is the Senator Elect from Hawaii and will be the first Asian-American woman in the Senate.

Tammy Duckworth is the Representative-elect for Illinois. She lost both her legs in the Iraq War and will be the first disabled female veteran elected to the House.

Tammy Baldwin is the Senator Elect from Winsconsin and the first openly gay person ever elected to the Senate.

(There was some misinformation over her stance on transgender issues (admittedly, the whole incident was a bit fuzzy at the end) but to clear things up, she has publically spoken out against transgender discrimination and advocated for their rights as recently as last year.)

GET IT, GRRRRRRRRRRRL!

This is also a historic election because there are now more women in the senate than in any other time in US history!

(via lipsredasroses)

“[Mitt Romney] is, in essence, a very arrogant, very successful businessman [who] believes in unreined free enterprise. He doesn’t have a clue what 99 per cent of the people are going through. He’s never lived on that level. He’s never had to compete for a job or face eviction or struggle to get a college loan. He’s a guy that the old phrase applies to: ‘he was born on third base and thought he hit a triple’… They say this kind of rhetoric that I’m doing right now is advocating class warfare, but that’s nonsense. There is no class warfare; the war ended a long time ago and the poor lost very badly.”
Martin Sheen (via bossypants)

(via ikenbot)

timeofthedecade:

bigdaddyg-wil:

this guy pulled out his dick in front of like 5 billion feminist protestors holy shit

Some context for the idiots claiming the women are overreacting:
This occurred at a Slut Walk. For those not familiar with it, the Slut Walk is basically a peaceful protest seeking to eliminate the rape apologism so prevalent in society. The basis is that no woman is “asking for it,” with “it” being rape. It’s not a feminist protest; it’s a human rights protest.
Many of the protesters, as you can probably imagine, have dealt with sexual harassment or rape in their own lives. Many of them have structured their daily activities to avoid being raped. The gathering is supposed to be a place for them to feel empowered and able to recover in the company of those who understand what they’ve been through or who will not blame them.
Nobody at a Slut Walk will tell a survivor that it’s her fault. They will not ask what she was wearing to provoke her attacker. Nobody will say she had too much to drink. Nobody will tell the men in the group that they are inherently rapists themselves, and nobody will tell a male survivor that his experience “wasn’t really rape.”
Then, this fellow comes along. He sees this gathering of survivors and their supporters, and to him, it’s a joke. He sees feminazis. He sees girls who are taking “a bit of fun” too seriously. And what does he do? He exposes himself to this group of survivors and supporters - some of whom are, in fact, underage.
He sexually harasses literally hundreds of women in one act. Aside from public indecency, there was cruel intent in his actions. He wanted to make them uncomfortable. He wanted to “put them in their place.” Other photos from this event show him flipping the protesters off and laughing at their anger.
And there are still people defending his actions. There are those who still feel like these women were asking for itand that they deserved to be harassed for trying to claim they weren’t. There are those who feel that women should be taught a lesson this way, and they applaud this man’s actions.
So no, he didn’t pull out his dick in front of feminist protesters. He harassed dozens - if not hundreds - of rape survivors. The reaction to his actions alone outline the purpose of the Slut Walk.
For those of you still doubting whether what he did was wrong (and I do wonder if there’s something wrong with you, if you have doubts), let me give you an analogous situation. Imagine a gathering of black civil rights activists. Imagine Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and all their colleagues gathered together to demonstrate that being black did not make them lesser people. That being black and living in the South did not mean they were “asking” to be the target of hate crimes.
And at this gathering, a white man decides he should teach them a lesson by pointedly hanging a noose from the nearest tree and laughing at their anger. And other white men, laughing along with him, commend him for taking these activists down a peg.
That’s what happened here. It’s not an “OMG, I can’t believe he did that!” moment. It’s an “OMG, there are people who think this is okay” moment. And the fact is, it’s not. It never will be. And that’s the take home message of this ridiculous rant I’ve written up.

timeofthedecade:

bigdaddyg-wil:

this guy pulled out his dick in front of like 5 billion feminist protestors holy shit

Some context for the idiots claiming the women are overreacting:

This occurred at a Slut Walk. For those not familiar with it, the Slut Walk is basically a peaceful protest seeking to eliminate the rape apologism so prevalent in society. The basis is that no woman is “asking for it,” with “it” being rape. It’s not a feminist protest; it’s a human rights protest.

Many of the protesters, as you can probably imagine, have dealt with sexual harassment or rape in their own lives. Many of them have structured their daily activities to avoid being raped. The gathering is supposed to be a place for them to feel empowered and able to recover in the company of those who understand what they’ve been through or who will not blame them.

Nobody at a Slut Walk will tell a survivor that it’s her fault. They will not ask what she was wearing to provoke her attacker. Nobody will say she had too much to drink. Nobody will tell the men in the group that they are inherently rapists themselves, and nobody will tell a male survivor that his experience “wasn’t really rape.”

Then, this fellow comes along. He sees this gathering of survivors and their supporters, and to him, it’s a joke. He sees feminazis. He sees girls who are taking “a bit of fun” too seriously. And what does he do? He exposes himself to this group of survivors and supporters - some of whom are, in fact, underage.

He sexually harasses literally hundreds of women in one act. Aside from public indecency, there was cruel intent in his actions. He wanted to make them uncomfortable. He wanted to “put them in their place.” Other photos from this event show him flipping the protesters off and laughing at their anger.

And there are still people defending his actions. There are those who still feel like these women were asking for itand that they deserved to be harassed for trying to claim they weren’t. There are those who feel that women should be taught a lesson this way, and they applaud this man’s actions.

So no, he didn’t pull out his dick in front of feminist protesters. He harassed dozens - if not hundreds - of rape survivors. The reaction to his actions alone outline the purpose of the Slut Walk.

For those of you still doubting whether what he did was wrong (and I do wonder if there’s something wrong with you, if you have doubts), let me give you an analogous situation. Imagine a gathering of black civil rights activists. Imagine Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and all their colleagues gathered together to demonstrate that being black did not make them lesser people. That being black and living in the South did not mean they were “asking” to be the target of hate crimes.

And at this gathering, a white man decides he should teach them a lesson by pointedly hanging a noose from the nearest tree and laughing at their anger. And other white men, laughing along with him, commend him for taking these activists down a peg.

That’s what happened here. It’s not an “OMG, I can’t believe he did that!” moment. It’s an “OMG, there are people who think this is okay” moment. And the fact is, it’s not. It never will be. And that’s the take home message of this ridiculous rant I’ve written up.

(via nothing-rhymes-with-ianto)

“Conservatives in the USA always see themselves as such victims, and refuse to take responsibility for anything. Ironic, considering that they are the party of personal responsibility (self-proclaimed). Everyone is always out to get them, and everything is someone else’s fault. War on religion. War on traditional values. The “gay” agenda. Blame immigrants. Blame liberals. Blame gays. Blame the poor. Blame teachers. Blame unions. Seriously, look for it. Next time the GOP is making a major national push for something, take a long hard look at what it is, and I can almost guarantee, that if isn’t something meant to benefit the rich, it will be something meant as a legislative slap in the face to some demographic of people.”
— A random comment on a news article that is the absolute truth in regards to the media narrative the right puts forward  (via abaldwin360)

(via amyleona)

lithelife:

fuckballsandlemonade:

namastetoyoutoo:

This is all you need to know about Mitt Romney.

My jaw dropped so violently when he said this that it popped.

In case anyone missed the debate, the candidates were asked what they would do to enhance job security and equality in the workplace for women. Romney’s response was around the idea of “I have hired many women in the past, thus I will continue to do so in the future. Women need special flexibility such as being able to go home to their children” (Paraphrased). Why on EARTH would you assume that only women have families at home depending on them to make dinner? Apparently sexism is now a new form of sensitivity in the workplace.

lithelife:

fuckballsandlemonade:

namastetoyoutoo:

This is all you need to know about Mitt Romney.

My jaw dropped so violently when he said this that it popped.

In case anyone missed the debate, the candidates were asked what they would do to enhance job security and equality in the workplace for women. Romney’s response was around the idea of “I have hired many women in the past, thus I will continue to do so in the future. Women need special flexibility such as being able to go home to their children” (Paraphrased). Why on EARTH would you assume that only women have families at home depending on them to make dinner? Apparently sexism is now a new form of sensitivity in the workplace.

(via nothing-rhymes-with-ianto)

“The 14% tax rate Romney paid is less than the 20% paid by the average American. How did he pay such a low rate? He claimed 47% of Americans as dependents.”
— Seth Meyers (via kateoplis)
misterandyandrogynous:

My favorite image on the internet.Thanks reddit. 

misterandyandrogynous:

My favorite image on the internet.

Thanks reddit.